The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
An Actual Natural Setting Improves Mood Better Than Its Virtual Counterpart: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew H. E. M. Browning, Nathan Shipley, Olivia McAnirlin, Douglas Becker, Chia-Pin Yu, Terry Hartig, Angel M. Dzhambov |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Design | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 60 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,392,601
of 25,052,270 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,758
of 33,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,876
of 418,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#165
of 805 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,052,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 805 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.