The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Critical Review of Studies Assessing Interpretation Bias Towards Social Stimuli in People With Eating Disorders and the Development and Pilot Testing of Novel Stimuli for a Cognitive Bias Modification Training
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538527 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katie Rowlands, Emma Wilson, Mima Simic, Amy Harrison, Valentina Cardi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 5 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,627,117
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,191
of 30,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,926
of 411,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#379
of 801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.