↓ Skip to main content

When Grades Are High but Self-Efficacy Is Low: Unpacking the Confidence Gap Between Girls and Boys in Mathematics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Grades Are High but Self-Efficacy Is Low: Unpacking the Confidence Gap Between Girls and Boys in Mathematics
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lysann Zander, Elisabeth Höhne, Sophie Harms, Maximilian Pfost, Matthew J. Hornsey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 54 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Mathematics 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 52 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,098,965
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,307
of 34,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,079
of 436,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#87
of 834 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 834 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.