You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COVID-19, Coronavirus, Wuhan Virus, or China Virus? Understanding How to “Do No Harm” When Naming an Infectious Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodore C. Masters-Waage, Nilotpal Jha, Jochen Reb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Turkey | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#727,034
of 24,132,691 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,479
of 32,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,775
of 515,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#63
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,132,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.