↓ Skip to main content

Essentialist Biases in Reasoning About Emotions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Essentialist Biases in Reasoning About Emotions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Berent, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Melanie Platt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 44%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,576,176
of 26,453,397 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,306
of 35,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,141
of 434,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#112
of 801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,453,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.