| Title |
Rapid Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Self-Guided Interventions to Address Anxiety, Depression, and Stress During COVID-19 Social Distancing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald Fischer, Tiago Bortolini, Johannes Alfons Karl, Marcelo Zilberberg, Kealagh Robinson, André Rabelo, Lucas Gemal, Daniel Wegerhoff, Thị Bảo Trâm Nguyễn, Briar Irving, Megan Chrystal, Paulo Mattos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 314 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 128 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 61 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 144 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,042,250
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,152
of 34,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,870
of 439,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#158
of 893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.