↓ Skip to main content

Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared Leadership and Team Effectiveness: An Investigation of Whether and When in Engineering Design Teams
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiong Wu, Kathryn Cormican

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Master 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 88 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 17 11%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 88 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,502,949
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,700
of 34,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,640
of 534,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#243
of 936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.