↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ching-Lin Wu, Shih-Yuan Huang, Pei-Zhen Chen, Hsueh-Chih Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Lecturer 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 49 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Engineering 5 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 51 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#702,882
of 26,188,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,456
of 35,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,343
of 444,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#55
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,188,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.