↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED: Influence of Resources on Cue Preferences in Mate Selection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED: Influence of Resources on Cue Preferences in Mate Selection
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Hou, Tianxin Shu, Xiaoyi Fang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 12 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,527,130
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,916
of 35,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,427
of 434,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#295
of 800 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 800 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.