↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Botella, Manuel Suero

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 33%
Neuroscience 2 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Mathematics 1 11%
Materials Science 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,943,531
of 26,559,802 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,370
of 35,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,523
of 437,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#244
of 814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.