↓ Skip to main content

Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moral Decision-Making, Stress, and Social Cognition in Frontline Workers vs. Population Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explorative Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Mazza, Margherita Attanasio, Maria Chiara Pino, Francesco Masedu, Sergio Tiberti, Michela Sarlo, Marco Valenti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 71 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 79 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,659,831
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,240
of 30,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,468
of 507,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#558
of 826 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 826 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.