The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Do Nocebo Phenomena Provide a Theoretical Framework for the COVID-19 Pandemic?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589884 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Amanzio, Jeremy Howick, Massimo Bartoli, Giuseppina Elena Cipriani, Jian Kong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Psychology | 10 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#857,596
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,806
of 34,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,327
of 442,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#74
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.