↓ Skip to main content

Spatial Abilities for Architecture: Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment With Novel and Existing Spatial Ability Tests

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial Abilities for Architecture: Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment With Novel and Existing Spatial Ability Tests
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Berkowitz, Andri Gerber, Christian M. Thurn, Beatrix Emo, Christoph Hoelscher, Elsbeth Stern

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 15%
Lecturer 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 34 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Design 9 13%
Psychology 7 10%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 35 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,809,727
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,455
of 31,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,128
of 506,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#615
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.