The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Statistical Significance Filtering Overestimates Effects and Impedes Falsification: A Critique of Endsley (2019)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609647 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Z. Bakdash, Laura R. Marusich, Jared B. Kenworthy, Elyssa Twedt, Erin G. Zaroukian |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 2 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,792,979
of 26,009,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,710
of 34,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,251
of 532,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#443
of 900 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,009,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 900 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.