The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Michelangelo Effect: Art Improves the Performance in a Virtual Reality Task Developed for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611956 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Iosa, Merve Aydin, Carolina Candelise, Natascia Coda, Giovanni Morone, Gabriella Antonucci, Franco Marinozzi, Fabiano Bini, Stefano Paolucci, Gaetano Tieri |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 44 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
Engineering | 6 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 44 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,293,951
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,509
of 30,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,055
of 503,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#159
of 906 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 906 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.