↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.617047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prathiba Natesan Batley, Ratna Nandakumar, Jayme M. Palka, Pragya Shrestha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Other 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#18,751,750
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,837
of 30,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#401,706
of 536,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#752
of 917 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 536,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 917 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.