↓ Skip to main content

Stressful Experiences in University Predict Non-suicidal Self-Injury Through Emotional Reactivity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stressful Experiences in University Predict Non-suicidal Self-Injury Through Emotional Reactivity
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloe A. Hamza, Abby L. Goldstein, Nancy L. Heath, Lexi Ewing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 47 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 47 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,725,292
of 26,554,122 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,172
of 35,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,905
of 462,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#327
of 1,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,554,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.