↓ Skip to main content

Decision-Making in the Human-Machine Interface

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-Making in the Human-Machine Interface
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624111
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Benjamin Falandays, Samuel Spevack, Philip Pärnamets, Michael Spivey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 21%
Engineering 3 16%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Decision Sciences 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,306,747
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,533
of 30,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,302
of 513,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#172
of 943 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 943 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.