↓ Skip to main content

Snitches Get Stitches and End Up in Ditches: A Systematic Review of the Factors Associated With Whistleblowing Intentions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Snitches Get Stitches and End Up in Ditches: A Systematic Review of the Factors Associated With Whistleblowing Intentions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam R. Nicholls, Lucas R. W. Fairs, John Toner, Luke Jones, Constantine Mantis, Vassilis Barkoukis, John L. Perry, Andrei V. Micle, Nikolaos C. Theodorou, Sabina Shakhverdieva, Marius Stoicescu, Milica V. Vesic, Nenad Dikic, Marija Andjelkovic, Elena García Grimau, Javier A. Amigo, Anne Schomöller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 44 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 45 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,387,443
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,679
of 35,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,720
of 442,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#252
of 1,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.