↓ Skip to main content

Metacognitive Labeling of Contentious Claims: Facts, Opinions, and Conspiracy Theories

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metacognitive Labeling of Contentious Claims: Facts, Opinions, and Conspiracy Theories
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Brotherton, Lisa K. Son

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 11 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#798,991
of 26,463,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,692
of 35,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,195
of 459,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#63
of 995 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,463,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 995 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.