↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-Processing Failures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
453 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-Processing Failures
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michaéla C. Schippers, Diana C. Rus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 453 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 45 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Psychology 7 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 49 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#100,920
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#200
of 35,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,965
of 461,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#5
of 1,526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.