The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protocol for a Phase Two, Parallel Three-Armed Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT-Adjust) Comparing Face-to-Face and Video Conferencing Delivery to Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury Experiencing Psychological Distress
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652323 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Diane L. Whiting, Grahame K. Simpson, Frank P. Deane, Sarah L. Chuah, Michelle Maitz, Jerre Weaver |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 13 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,648,449
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,213
of 30,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,143
of 422,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#442
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.