↓ Skip to main content

The Ginevra de’ Benci Effect: Competence, Morality, and Attractiveness Inferred From Faces Predict Hiring Decisions for Women

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Ginevra de’ Benci Effect: Competence, Morality, and Attractiveness Inferred From Faces Predict Hiring Decisions for Women
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michela Menegatti, Sara Pireddu, Elisabetta Crocetti, Silvia Moscatelli, Monica Rubini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,825,816
of 23,879,989 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,019
of 32,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,821
of 430,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#492
of 1,203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,879,989 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.