↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation and Grouping Practices as a Response to Heterogeneity – Teachers’ Implementation of Inclusive Teaching Approaches in Regular, Inclusive and Special Classrooms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differentiation and Grouping Practices as a Response to Heterogeneity – Teachers’ Implementation of Inclusive Teaching Approaches in Regular, Inclusive and Special Classrooms
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina-Theresa Lindner, Lena Nusser, Karin Gehrer, Susanne Schwab

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 7 23%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 16%
Psychology 3 10%
Linguistics 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 16 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,739,821
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#17,622
of 35,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,233
of 438,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#673
of 1,623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.