↓ Skip to main content

Biopsychosocial Predictors of Quality of Life in Paediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biopsychosocial Predictors of Quality of Life in Paediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna M Hood, Melanie Kölbel, Hanne Stotesbury, Jamie Kawadler, April Slee, Baba Inusa, Maria Pelidis, Jo Howard, Subarna Chakravorty, Sue Height, Moji Awogbade, Fenella J Kirkham, Christina Liossi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 42 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Psychology 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 41 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,673,795
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,325
of 30,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,066
of 430,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#487
of 1,618 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,618 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.