The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mistrust and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Differently Mediate the Effects of Psychological Factors on Propensity for COVID-19 Vaccine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683684 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Simione, Monia Vagni, Camilla Gnagnarella, Giuseppe Bersani, Daniela Pajardi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 84 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,905,283
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,892
of 34,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,190
of 452,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#138
of 1,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.