↓ Skip to main content

Data Set on the Use of Continuous Improvement Programs in Companies From Open-Ended Questions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data Set on the Use of Continuous Improvement Programs in Companies From Open-Ended Questions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amable Juarez-Tarraga, Cristina Santandreu-Mascarell, Juan A. Marin-Garcia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#12,767,056
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,477
of 29,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,020
of 431,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#384
of 1,583 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,583 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.