↓ Skip to main content

Job Insecurity and Job Performance: A Serial Mediated Relationship and the Buffering Effect of Organizational Justice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Job Insecurity and Job Performance: A Serial Mediated Relationship and the Buffering Effect of Organizational Justice
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco De Angelis, Greta Mazzetti, Dina Guglielmi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Lecturer 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Researcher 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 78 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 18 13%
Psychology 18 13%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 83 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,263,724
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,418
of 30,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,849
of 427,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#134
of 1,611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.