↓ Skip to main content

Vulnerable Narcissism in Social Networking Sites: The Role of Upward and Downward Social Comparisons

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vulnerable Narcissism in Social Networking Sites: The Role of Upward and Downward Social Comparisons
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fanchang Kong, Meiru Wang, Xingjie Zhang, Xiaoyao Li, Xiaojun Sun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Researcher 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 32%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 15 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,126,457
of 26,567,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,371
of 35,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,641
of 440,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#386
of 1,625 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,567,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,625 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.