↓ Skip to main content

The Problematic Concept of Native Speaker in Psycholinguistics: Replacing Vague and Harmful Terminology With Inclusive and Accurate Measures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Problematic Concept of Native Speaker in Psycholinguistics: Replacing Vague and Harmful Terminology With Inclusive and Accurate Measures
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauretta S. P. Cheng, Danielle Burgess, Natasha Vernooij, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, Ashley McDermott, Savithry Namboodiripad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 29 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 24 30%
Psychology 7 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 34 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,533,590
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,212
of 35,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,478
of 442,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#92
of 1,572 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,572 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.