The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shame on You! When and Why Failure-Induced Shame Impedes Employees’ Learning From Failure in the Chinese Context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenzhou Wang, Shanghao Song, Jiaqi Wang, Qi Liu, Lishi Huang, Xiaoxuan Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,528,006
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,048
of 35,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,750
of 441,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#153
of 1,561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.