You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining Job Complexity on Job Crafting Within Conservation of Resources Theory: A Dual-Path Mediation Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Yi Bai, Qing Tian, Xia Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,307,929
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,457
of 35,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,492
of 441,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#567
of 1,561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.