↓ Skip to main content

The Ethical Use of Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations for Psychologists

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Ethical Use of Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling: Recommendations for Psychologists
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryant M. Stone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Lecturer 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 36 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 13%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 42 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#21,132
of 30,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,326
of 510,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#923
of 1,562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.