↓ Skip to main content

“Mine Works Better”: Examining the Influence of Embodiment in Virtual Reality on the Sense of Agency During a Binary Motor Imagery Task With a Brain-Computer Interface

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Mine Works Better”: Examining the Influence of Embodiment in Virtual Reality on the Sense of Agency During a Binary Motor Imagery Task With a Brain-Computer Interface
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.806424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamzah Ziadeh, David Gulyas, Louise Dørr Nielsen, Steffen Lehmann, Thomas Bendix Nielsen, Thomas Kim Kroman Kjeldsen, Bastian Ilsø Hougaard, Mads Jochumsen, Hendrik Knoche

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Unspecified 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 24 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 10%
Unspecified 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 25 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#22,030,002
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#26,566
of 33,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#431,844
of 509,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,067
of 1,481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.