The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A survey of AI ethics in business literature: Maps and trends between 2000 and 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042661 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Tulio Daza, Usochi Joanann Ilozumba |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Qatar | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,440,338
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,732
of 35,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,894
of 491,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#152
of 1,699 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,699 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.