↓ Skip to main content

Affect and Cognition in Managerial Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review of Neuroscience Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Affect and Cognition in Managerial Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review of Neuroscience Evidence
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.762993
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Cristofaro, Pier Luigi Giardino, Andrea P. Malizia, Antonio Mastrogiorgio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 16 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 13%
Mathematics 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 16 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,156,937
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,515
of 30,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,338
of 440,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#555
of 1,655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.