↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of Online Misinformation on COVID-19: Two Potential Pathways and Disparity by eHealth Literacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consequences of Online Misinformation on COVID-19: Two Potential Pathways and Disparity by eHealth Literacy
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hye Kyung Kim, Edson C. Tandoc

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 27 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Psychology 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 29 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,436,158
of 23,983,331 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,804
of 32,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,092
of 518,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#113
of 1,660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.