The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Examining Multiteam Systems Across Context and Type: A Historiometric Analysis of Failed MTS Performance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lauren N. P. Campbell, Elisa M. Torres, Stephen J. Zaccaro, Steven Zhou, Katelyn N. Hedrick, David M. Wallace, Celeste Raver Luning, Joanna E. Zakzewski |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Ireland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Psychology | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,541,103
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,520
of 31,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,731
of 440,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#255
of 1,655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.