The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deficits in Emotion Recognition and Theory of Mind in Parkinson’s Disease Patients With and Without Cognitive Impairments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866809 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandra Dodich, Giulia Funghi, Claudia Meli, Maria Pennacchio, Chiara Longo, Maria Chiara Malaguti, Raffaella Di Giacopo, Francesca Zappini, Luca Turella, Costanza Papagno |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 19% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,153,131
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,429
of 29,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,210
of 437,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#359
of 1,805 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,805 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.