↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the Structural Validity of the Reduced Version of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of the Structural Validity of the Reduced Version of Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Ondé, Virginia Jiménez, Jesús M. Alvarado, Marta Gràcia

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Unspecified 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 26%
Psychology 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Linguistics 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#14,548,730
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,502
of 30,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,384
of 442,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#516
of 1,909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.