↓ Skip to main content

There must be a way out: The consensual qualitative analysis of best coping practices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
There must be a way out: The consensual qualitative analysis of best coping practices during the COVID-19 pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Júlia Halamová, Katarína Greškovičová, Martina Baránková, Bronislava Strnádelová, Katarina Krizova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 24 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 24 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,647,139
of 23,548,905 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,975
of 31,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,163
of 438,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#313
of 1,814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,548,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.