↓ Skip to main content

Multi-informant validity evidence for the SSIS SEL Brief Scales across six European countries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-informant validity evidence for the SSIS SEL Brief Scales across six European countries
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Anthony, Stephen N. Elliott, Michayla Yost, Pui-Wa Lei, James C. DiPerna, Carmel Cefai, Liberato Camilleri, Paul A. Bartolo, Ilaria Grazzani, Veronica Ornaghi, Valeria Cavioni, Elisabetta Conte, Sanja Tatalović Vorkapić, Maria Poulou, Baiba Martinsone, Celeste Simões, Aurora Adina Colomeischi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 36%
Psychology 5 20%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,068,233
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,428
of 30,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,485
of 433,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#516
of 1,821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.