You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the Design and Validation of Assessing Tools for Measuring the Impact of Programs Promoting STEM Vocations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Pilar Herce-Palomares, Carmen Botella-Mascarell, Esther de Ves, Emilia López-Iñesta, Anabel Forte, Xaro Benavent, Silvia Rueda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,216,247
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,330
of 34,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,606
of 445,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#195
of 2,017 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,017 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.