The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical EFT as an evidence-based practice for the treatment of psychological and physiological conditions: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951451 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawson Church, Peta Stapleton, Anitha Vasudevan, Tom O'Keefe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 84 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Psychology | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 85 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#970,848
of 26,525,642 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,090
of 35,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,420
of 447,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#29
of 1,920 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,525,642 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,920 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.