↓ Skip to main content

Midlife occupational cognitive requirements protect cognitive function in old age by increasing cognitive reserve

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Midlife occupational cognitive requirements protect cognitive function in old age by increasing cognitive reserve
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Kleineidam, Steffen Wolfsgruber, Anne-Sophie Weyrauch, Linn E. Zulka, Simon Forstmeier, Sandra Roeske, Hendrik van den Bussche, Hanna Kaduszkiewicz, Birgitt Wiese, Siegfried Weyerer, Jochen Werle, Angela Fuchs, Michael Pentzek, Christian Brettschneider, Hans-Helmut König, Dagmar Weeg, Horst Bickel, Melanie Luppa, Francisca S. Rodriguez, Silka Dawn Freiesleben, Selin Erdogan, Chantal Unterfeld, Oliver Peters, Eike J. Spruth, Slawek Altenstein, Andrea Lohse, Josef Priller, Klaus Fliessbach, Xenia Kobeleva, Anja Schneider, Claudia Bartels, Björn H. Schott, Jens Wiltfang, Franziska Maier, Wenzel Glanz, Enise I. Incesoy, Michaela Butryn, Emrah Düzel, Katharina Buerger, Daniel Janowitz, Michael Ewers, Boris-Stephan Rauchmann, Robert Perneczky, Ingo Kilimann, Doreen Görß, Stefan Teipel, Christoph Laske, Matthias H. J. Munk, Annika Spottke, Nina Roy, Frederic Brosseron, Michael T. Heneka, Alfredo Ramirez, Renat Yakupov, Martin Scherer, Wolfgang Maier, Frank Jessen, Steffi G. Riedel-Heller, Michael Wagner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 13 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,924,060
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,590
of 31,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,976
of 443,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#59
of 1,696 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,696 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.