↓ Skip to main content

Effect of social media use on food safety risk perception through risk characteristics: Exploring a moderated mediation model among people with different levels of science literacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of social media use on food safety risk perception through risk characteristics: Exploring a moderated mediation model among people with different levels of science literacy
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963863
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Zhang, Hsi-Chen Wu, Liang Chen, Youzhen Su

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 25%
Researcher 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 25%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,586,817
of 24,701,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,524
of 33,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,138
of 430,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#497
of 1,831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,594 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.