↓ Skip to main content

New is not always better: Virtual reality does not necessarily enhance mnemonic processing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New is not always better: Virtual reality does not necessarily enhance mnemonic processing
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1089725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marike Johnsdorf, Kim Anh Pham, Tino Schmidt, Van Ly Truong, Andre Wohnig, Joanna Kisker, Thomas Gruber, Benjamin Schöne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,761,844
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,927
of 31,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,141
of 362,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#660
of 1,309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.