↓ Skip to main content

An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chad E. Cook, Antoine Bailliard, Jennifer A. Bent, Joel E. Bialosky, Elisa Carlino, Luana Colloca, Jorge E. Esteves, Dave Newell, Alvisa Palese, William R. Reed, Jennifer Plumb Vilardaga, Giacomo Rossettini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Unspecified 6 10%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Unspecified 7 12%
Psychology 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,009,478
of 26,525,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,167
of 35,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,634
of 379,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#26
of 881 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,525,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 881 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.