The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do bystanders always see more than the players? Exploring Solomon’s paradox through meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongyi Lin, Hong Zheng, Fengyan Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 114 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 86% |
| Scientists | 13 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#420,571
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#884
of 35,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,096
of 369,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#9
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.