↓ Skip to main content

Reading for gain or reading for fun: empirical evidence from China on the adoption mechanism of integrated children’s books

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reading for gain or reading for fun: empirical evidence from China on the adoption mechanism of integrated children’s books
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiayong Cui, Jing Guo, Jiaomin Yang, Lingyu Wu, Yinuo Bao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,278,155
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,543
of 35,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,058
of 379,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#239
of 737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.